Who gets to stay in the family home after separation in British Columbia?
Separation by itself does not require either spouse to move out, and whose name is on the title or the lease does not settle it. If you cannot agree, the Supreme Court can give one spouse exclusive occupation of the home for a set period. Where there is family violence, a protection order can require a person to leave and stay away.
Exclusive occupation
Section 90 of the Family Law Act lets the Supreme Court give one spouse exclusive occupation of the family residence for a specified period, and the use of furniture and other belongings kept there. The family residence is the home the spouses ordinarily live in, whether one of them or both own or rent it.
The order is temporary. It does not change who owns the home or give the spouse who stays any ownership interest, and it does not allow major alterations. While it is in place the court can postpone a sale of the home. Only the Supreme Court can make this order.
When the court grants exclusive occupation
The Act does not say when the order should be made. The test comes from decisions of the Supreme Court. The spouse who applies must show two things: that sharing the home is a practical impossibility, and that on the balance of convenience he or she is the preferred occupant. A practical impossibility is a situation that is intolerable or unacceptable when looked at objectively. The longer the spouses have gone on living under one roof since they separated, the harder that is to show.
For the balance of convenience the court weighs the disadvantage to each spouse of making the order or refusing it. It looks at any delay or acquiescence, how each spouse has behaved, each one's finances, what other accommodation each could find, and other circumstances such as health. Where there are children, their best interests are the court's primary consideration, and a household so tense that the children's best interests are not being met will generally satisfy the first part of the test.
Where there is family violence
A protection order under Part 9 of the Act can restrain a person from attending or entering the home, even if that person owns it or has a right to possess it. It can direct the police to remove the person at once or within a set time, and to stand by while belongings are collected. Either the Provincial Court or the Supreme Court can make it, and it can be made without notice in an urgent case.
Paying for the home in the meantime
A court can order a party to pay the rent or mortgage, utilities, taxes, insurance and other expenses of a residence, and can forbid a party from cutting off the utilities. On a spouse's application the Supreme Court must also restrain the other spouse from disposing of property that is at issue in the case, unless that spouse shows the claim will not be harmed.
Moving out does not give up your share
On separation each spouse has a right to an undivided half interest in all family property, whatever each contributed and whoever used it. Leaving the home does not change that. Who lives in the home for now and who ends up with it, or with its value, are separate questions.
Who counts as a spouse
These property rules apply to married spouses and to people who have lived together in a marriage-like relationship for at least two years. A couple who lived together for less than two years are not spouses for property division, so section 90 does not apply to them, though a protection order is open to any family member.
The law
Each link opens the source itself: the section on BC Laws or Justice Laws, the court’s own copy of a decision, or the page of the body that publishes it. Checked on November 11, 2026.
- Family Law Act, SBC 2011, c 25, s 90 — exclusive occupation of the family residence
- Hohmann v Hohmann, 2024 BCSC 100 at paras 13 to 15 — the two-part test, the children's best interests, and the effect of continuing to share the home
- Mainwaring v Mainwaring, 2025 BCSC 740 at paras 33 to 36 — what a practical impossibility is, and how the balance of convenience is weighed
- Ulrich v Ulrich, 2026 BCSC 808 at paras 14 to 16 — the test and the factors, as applied in 2026
- Family Law Act, s 91 — orders restraining a spouse from disposing of property
- Family Law Act, s 81 — each spouse's half interest in family property on separation
- Family Law Act, s 183 — protection orders, including removal from the residence
- Family Law Act, s 193 — the Provincial Court cannot make property orders, but can restrict access to a residence by a protection order
- Family Law Act, s 226 — orders about rent, mortgage, utilities and other costs of a residence
- Family Law Act, s 3 — who is a spouse
People also ask
- Does an exclusive occupation order give me the house?
- No. The Act says the order does not give a spouse an ownership interest in the home. Who keeps the home, or how its value is shared, is decided separately when family property is divided.
- Can my spouse sell or mortgage the home while this is being sorted out?
- You can apply to the Supreme Court for an order restraining it. The court must make that order unless your spouse shows your claim will not be defeated or harmed by the sale or mortgage.
- Can the Provincial Court order my spouse out of the home?
- Not by an exclusive occupation order, which only the Supreme Court can make. The Provincial Court can make a protection order that keeps a person away from the home to protect a family member living there.
Read more
General information about the law in British Columbia, not legal advice. Laws change and every situation differs; speak to a lawyer before acting on anything here.